4.7 Article

A fuzzy topology-based maximum likelihood classification

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.09.007

关键词

Fuzzy topology; Maximum likelihood classification (MLC); Thresholding; Remote sensing; Land cover mapping

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research and Development Program (973 Program) [2006CB701305]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YX0P, G-YF24, G-YG66, 1-ZV4F]
  3. Hong Kong RGC [5276/08]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation [40629001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classification is one of the most widely used remote sensing analysis techniques, with the maximum likelihood classification (MLC) method being a major tool for classifying pixels from an image. Fuzzy topology, in which the set concept is generalized from two values, (0, 1), to the values of a continuous interval, [0, 1], is a generalization of ordinary topology and is used to solve many GIS problems, such as spatial information management and analysis. Fuzzy topology is induced by traditional thresholding and as such gives a decomposition of MLC classes. Presented in this paper is an image classification modification, by which induced threshold fuzzy topology is integrated into the MLC method (FTMLC). Hence, by using the induced threshold fuzzy topology, each image class in spectral space can be decomposed into three parts: an interior, a boundary and an exterior. The connection theory in induced fuzzy topology enables the boundary to be combined with the interior. That is, a new classification method is derived by integrating the induced fuzzy topology and the MLC method. As a result, fuzzy boundary pixels, which contain many misclassified and over-classified pixels, are able to be re-classified, providing improved classification accuracy. This classification is a significantly improved pixel classification method, and hence provides improved classification accuracy. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据