4.0 Article

Effect of age and ration on diet-tissue isotopic (Δ13C, Δ15N) discrimination in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis)

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2014.867852

关键词

age; carbon-13; isotope ecology; isotopic discrimination; nitrogen-15; nutrition; striped skunk

资金

  1. Environment Canada
  2. University of Saskatchewan
  3. Delta Waterfowl and Wetlands Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important prerequisite for the effective use of stable isotopes in animal ecology is the accurate assessment of isotopic discrimination factors linking animals to their diets for a multitude of tissue types. Surprisingly, these values are poorly known in general and especially for mammalian carnivores and omnivores in particular. Also largely unknown are the factors that influence diet-tissue isotopic discrimination such as nutritional quality and age. We raised adult and juvenile striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) in captivity on a constant omnivore diet (Mazuri Omnivore A 5635). Adults (n = 6) and juveniles (n = 3) were kept for 7 months and young (n = 7) to the age of 50 days. We then examined individuals for stable carbon (delta C-13) and nitrogen ((delta)1(5)N) isotope values of hair, nails, lipid, liver, muscle, bone collagen and the plasma, and cellular fractions of blood. Discrimination values differed among age groups and were significantly higher for young compared with their mothers, likely due to the effects of weaning. Delta N-15 isotopic discrimination factors ranged from 3.14 (nails) to 5.6% (plasma) in adults and 4.3 (nails) to 5.8% (liver) for young. For Delta C-13, values ranged from -3.3 (fat) to 3.0% (collagen) in adults and from -3.3 (fat) to 2.0% (collagen) in young. Our data provide an important tool for predicting diets and source of feeding for medium-sized mammalian omnivorous adults integrated over short (e. g. liver, plasma) through long (e. g. collagen) periods and underline the potential effects of age on isotopic values in omnivore diets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据