4.0 Article

A new 15N tracer method to determine N turnover and denitrification of Pseudomonas stutzeri

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2010.528840

关键词

denitrification; isotope pairing; Pseudomonas stutzeri; nitrogen-15; isotope ecology; tracer technique

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 788]
  2. EU
  3. Helmholtz/Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although denitrification is one of the key processes of ecosystem N turnover, the understanding of the regulation of the denitrification pathway is still limited due to the lack of feasible methods for the quantification of N2 formation. Based on the previously developed isotope pairing method, we present a new in vitro 15N tracer method for the quantification of N2 released from denitrification by bacterial cultures. The application of the new method was enabled by replacing the background air in the sample flasks with a gas mixture of He and O2 with an approximately 50-fold reduced N2 background (1.7% v/v), allowing for a direct and sensitive quantification of N2 formation with isotope-ratio mass spectrometry after 15N-labelling on the one hand, but leaving the method relatively insensitive to intrusion of ambient N2 on the other hand. The method was tested on bacterial cultures of Pseudomonas stutzeri grown at different oxygen levels. Additionally, NO and N2O formation were determined with a chemoluminescence analyser and a gas chromatograph, respectively. Following labelling with 15N-ammonium and 15N-nitrate, it could be shown that P. stutzeri used ammonium preferably for biomass build-up, and nitrate preferably as electron acceptor. Between 84-107% of the total available N could be recovered. Due to the high sensitivity of the new method only low levels of 15N tracer were necessary, minimising substrate-induced effects and making this method also an appropriate tool for the use on soil cores. By that it offers a new method for studying denitrification in terrestrial ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据