4.8 Article

Transcriptional response of bathypelagic marine bacterioplankton to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 2315-2329

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.129

关键词

Deepwater Horizon; transcriptomics; oil degradation; methane oxidation

资金

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. US National Science Foundation [OCE-1043225]
  3. Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program of the DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Deepwater Horizon blowout released a massive amount of oil and gas into the deep ocean between April and July 2010, stimulating microbial blooms of petroleum-degrading bacteria. To understand the metabolic response of marine microorganisms, we sequenced similar to 66 million community transcripts that revealed the identity of metabolically active microbes and their roles in petroleum consumption. Reads were assigned to reference genes from similar to 2700 bacterial and archaeal taxa, but most assignments (39%) were to just six genomes representing predominantly methane-and petroleum-degrading Gammaproteobacteria. Specific pathways for the degradation of alkanes, aromatic compounds and methane emerged from the metatranscriptomes, with some transcripts assigned to methane monooxygenases representing highly divergent homologs that may degrade either methane or short alkanes. The microbial community in the plume was less taxonomically and functionally diverse than the unexposed community below the plume; this was due primarily to decreased species evenness resulting from Gammaproteobacteria blooms. Surprisingly, a number of taxa (related to SAR11, Nitrosopumilus and Bacteroides, among others) contributed equal numbers of transcripts per liter in both the unexposed and plume samples, suggesting that some groups were unaffected by the petroleum inputs and blooms of degrader taxa, and may be important for re-establishing the pre-spill microbial community structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据