4.8 Article

High-resolution imaging of pelagic bacteria by Atomic Force Microscopy and implications for carbon cycling

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 427-439

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2009.116

关键词

biovolume; heterotrophic marine bacteria; cyanobacteria; bacteriophage; AFM

资金

  1. Division of Ocean Sciences, NSF [OCE-0417616, ANT-0444134]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Marine Microbiology Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In microbial oceanography, cell size, volume and carbon (C) content of pelagic bacteria and archaea ('bacteria') are critical parameters in addressing the in situ physiology and functions of bacteria, and their role in the food web and C cycle. However, because of the diminutive size of most pelagic bacteria and errors caused by sample fixation and processing, an accurate measurement of the size and volume has been challenging. We used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to obtain high-resolution images of pelagic bacteria and Synechococcus. We measured the length, width and height of live and formalin-fixed pelagic bacteria, and computed individual cell volumes. AFM-based measurements were compared with those by epifluorescence microscopy (EFM) using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The ability to measure cell height by AFM provides methodological advantage and ecophysiological insight. For the samples examined, EFM (DAPI)-based average cell volume was in good agreement (1.1-fold) with live sample AFM. However, the agreement may be a fortuitous balance between cell shrinkage due to fixation/drying (threefold) and Z-overestimation (as EFM does not account for cell flattening caused by sample processing and assumes that height width). The two methods showed major differences in cell volume and cell C frequency distributions. This study refines the methodology for quantifying bacteria-mediated C fluxes and the role of bacteria in marine ecosystems, and suggests the potential of AFM for individual cell physiological interrogations in natural marine assemblages. The ISME Journal (2010) 4, 427-439; doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.116; published online 26 November 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据