4.8 Article

Humoral immunity to commensal oral bacteria in human infants:: evidence that Streptococcus mitis biovar 1 colonization induces strain-specific salivary immunoglobulin A antibodies

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 728-738

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2008.26

关键词

S. mitis biovar 1; infants; saliva; SIgA antibody

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE08171] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To define the relationship between salivary SIgA antibodies and commensal oral bacteria, we examined the reactivity of SIgA antibodies from the saliva of four infants with their own colonizing Streptococcus mitis biovar 1 (S. mitis bv 1) clones (ribotypes). Immunoblot analysis was used to examine reactivity of these antibodies with persistent ribotypes isolated from the mouths of the infants over the first year postpartum. Results showed that the pattern of SIgA antibody reactivity with the majority of clones increased in complexity after colonization but that most additional bands were common to other clones, indicating that they represented shared antigens. However, unique bands were identified in 75% of the selected persistent clones. We hypothesized that if strain-specific SIgA antibody was induced in response to colonization of a particular clone and contributed to its elimination from the mouth, then the appearance of unique bands would immediately precede the disappearance of the strain. Seventy-three percent of all unique bands identified in the study fulfilled this criterion. Because the mouth is an open, dynamic environment and multiple factors are believed to play a role in the immune response at mucosal surfaces, it may not be possible to conclusively define the relationship between SIgA antibody and commensal bacteria. However, our data provide evidence that SIgA antibody, reactive with unique antigens of their own colonizing strains, is produced in infants and may point to a role of this antibody in regulating colonization by S. mitis bv 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据