4.6 Article

Stress-response balance drives the evolution of a network module and its host genome

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20156185

关键词

drug resistance; experimental evolution; positive feedback; synthetic gene circuit; tradeoff

资金

  1. NIH Director's New Innovator Award Program [1DP2 OD006481-01]
  2. NSF/IOS [1021675]
  3. Laufer Center for Physical & Quantitative Biology
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  5. Ministry of Education and Science [1326]
  6. Russian Federation
  7. Division of Academic Affairs at the MD Anderson Cancer
  8. NCI [CA16672]
  9. NSF [1066293, PHY11-25915]
  10. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  11. Direct For Biological Sciences [1021675] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stress response genes and their regulators form networks that underlie drug resistance. These networks often have an inherent tradeoff: their expression is costly in the absence of stress, but beneficial in stress. They can quickly emerge in the genomes of infectious microbes and cancer cells, protecting them from treatment. Yet, the evolution of stress resistance networks is not well understood. Here, we use a two-component synthetic gene circuit integrated into the budding yeast genome to model experimentally the adaptation of a stress response module and its host genome in three different scenarios. In agreement with computational predictions, we find that: (i) intra-module mutations target and eliminate the module if it confers only cost without any benefit to the cell; (ii) intra- and extra-module mutations jointly activate the module if it is potentially beneficial and confers no cost; and (iii) a few specific mutations repeatedly fine-tune the module's noisy response if it has excessive costs and/or insufficient benefits. Overall, these findings reveal how the timing and mechanisms of stress response network evolution depend on the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据