4.6 Article

Integrative network analysis reveals molecular mechanisms of blood pressure regulation

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20145399

关键词

blood pressure; coexpression network; gene expression; hypertension; systems biology

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [N01-HC-25195]
  2. Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health
  3. NIH [K08HL121671]
  4. Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  5. Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  6. American Heart Association Scientist Development [13SDG17290032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous loci associated with blood pressure (BP). The molecular mechanisms underlying BP regulation, however, remain unclear. We investigated BP-associated molecular mechanisms by integrating BP GWAS with whole blood mRNA expression profiles in 3,679 individuals, using network approaches. BP transcriptomic signatures at the single-gene and the coexpression network module levels were identified. Four coexpression modules were identified as potentially causal based on genetic inference because expression-related SNPs for their corresponding genes demonstrated enrichment for BP GWAS signals. Genes from the four modules were further projected onto predefined molecular interaction networks, revealing key drivers. Gene subnetworks entailing molecular interactions between key drivers and BP-related genes were uncovered. As proof-of-concept, we validated SH2B3, one of the top key drivers, using Sh2b3(-/-) mice. We found that a significant number of genes predicted to be regulated by SH2B3 in gene networks are perturbed in Sh2b3(-/-) mice, which demonstrate an exaggerated pressor response to angiotensin II infusion. Our findings may help to identify novel targets for the prevention or treatment of hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据