4.2 Article

Elevated prevalence of abnormal glucose metabolism in patients with primary aldosteronism: a meta-analysis

期刊

IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 183, 期 2, 页码 283-291

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-013-1007-x

关键词

Abnormal glucose metabolism; Metabolic disease; Primary aldosteronism; Metaanalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To conduct a meta-analysis of studies assessing abnormal glucose metabolism (AGM) prevalence among patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), calculating a combined pooled prevalence and summarizing metabolic parameters associated the pooled prevalence for comparative group. Method Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ISI-Web of Science) were systematically retrieved with no language and time restriction. Studies about elevated level of glucose metabolism in primary aldosteronism were included. Result Data were available in 16 studies. The pooled analysis revealed that the prevalence of elevated glucose in PA was 22.41 % (95 % CI 16.77-28.05 %), the retrospectively calculated prevalence was 31.20 % (95 % CI 15.81-46.60 %) for impaired fasting glucose, 26.19 % (95 % CI 15.17-37.21 %) for impaired glucose tolerance, 15.22 % (95 % CI 9.93-20.51 %) for diabetes mellitus. Prevalence of AGM in PA was higher than that in essential hypertension (OR = 1.55, 95 % CI 1.01-2.36, p = 0.04). From comparative groups, patients with primary aldosteronism had a lower level of insulin sensitivity indicators in comparison with normal group (p < 0.01). On the other hand, insulin resistance which presented by HOMA index was stronger in PA group than in normal control group (WMD = 0.41, 95 % CI 0.17, 0.65; p = 0.001), whereas it was weaker than that in EH group (WMD = -0.37, 95 % CI -0.62, -0.13; p = 0.003). Conclusion There is a significant prevalence of elevated level of glucose metabolism in patients with PA. Awareness and treatment of this pre-diabetic or diabetic state are necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据