4.5 Article

Characterization of UV-irradiated Lexan polycarbonate films

期刊

IRANIAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 341-349

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13726-013-0133-7

关键词

UV radiation; Lexan polycarbonate; Structural properties; Mechanical properties; Chain scission

资金

  1. Board of Research in Nuclear Science, Department of Atomic Energy of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lexan polycarbonate films were irradiated by UV radiation at wavelength lambda = 250 nm under different time exposures of 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 h. Structural, optical and mechanical modifications were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), UV-Visible spectroscopy, impedance analysis, tensile testing and rheometry methods. The crystallite size and percentage of crystallinity were found to decrease upon irradiation as was studied by XRD. It indicated that polymer was moving towards more disordered state after irradiation corroborating DSC results. FTIR Study showed the carbonate linkage is the radiation-sensitive linkage and benzene ring does not undergo any change after irradiation. SEM results showed the formation of pores after irradiation. The atomic force microscopy measurements revealed that the average roughness of the film increased after being irradiated. The glass transition temperature was observed to decrease after irradiation as revealed by DSC measurement. UV-Visible spectra showed decrease in optical band gap after irradiation due to chain scission in the Lexan polycarbonate. Plot of AC conductivity versus log (f) displayed a sharp increase in conductivity at higher frequencies and dielectric constant/loss was observed to change with the irradiation time. The mechanical properties and average molecular weight of Lexan polycarbonate decreased after irradiation, while the average number of chain scissions per original polymer molecule increased with increase in time of exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据