4.6 Article

Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Evaluation of the High Relaxivity Low Diffusible Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent P846 in Comparison With Gadoterate Meglumine in Rabbits at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 12, 页码 837-842

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181852158

关键词

contrast media; gadolinium; relaxivity; magnetic resonance angiography; field strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the gadolinium-based contrast agent P846 and compare it with gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in rabbits at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. respectively. Materials and Methods: Five rabbits underwent contrast-enhanced MRA of the abdominal vasculature applying gadolinium doses of 0.025 mmoL/kg for P846 and 0.1 mmoL/kg for Gd-DOTA, respectively. All animals were examined on a 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR system. Image data were acquired during the first-pass arterial phase and repeatedly over 10 minutes. Contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was determined in the aorta, the inferior vena cava, and the renal cortex. Image quality of arterial phase MR angiograms was consensually judged on a 5-point scale (5 = high). Results: Contrast-enhanced MRA was successful in all cases with both contrast agents. CNR values consistently proved statistically significantly higher for P846 compared with Gd-DOTA, CNR values in the aorta during the arterial phase were 46.0 +/- 3.7 (P846) and 28.0 +/- 3.2 (Gd-DOTA) at 1.5 T (P < 0.05), and correspondingly 89.3 +/- 12.7 (PS46) and 64.1 +/- 15.0 (Gd-DOTA) at 3.0 T (P < 0.05). Image quality of arterial phase MR angiograms was rated with scores of 4.8 +/- 0.4 (P846) and 4.0 +/- 0.0 (Cid-DOTA) at 1.5 T (P = 0.06), and 5.0 +/- 0.0 (11846) and 4.8 +/- 0.4 (Gd-DOTA) at 3.0 T (P = 0.42). respectively. Conclusions: The contrast agent P846 provides high contrast enhancement and image quality for contrast-enhanced MRA in rabbits at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with a 4-fold lower gadolinium dose compared with a standard extracellular contrast agent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据