4.5 Article

Preclinical assessment of histone deacetylase inhibitor quisinostat as a therapeutic agent against esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 616-624

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-018-0651-4

关键词

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Quisinostat; Histone deacetylase; Cancer therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81702286, 81300882]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2017YSKY0001]
  3. Special Foundation for Young Scientists of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital [2016QN11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most serious life-threatening malignancies. Although chemotherapeutic targets and agents for ESCC have made much progress recently, the efficacy is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, there is still an unmet medical need for patients with ESCC. Here, we report the expression status of HDAC1 in human ESCC and matched paracancerous tissues, and the results indicated that HDAC1 was generally upregulated in ESCC specimens. Furthermore, we comprehensively assessed the anti-ESCC activity of a highly active HDAC1 inhibitor quisinostat. Quisinostat could effectively suppress cellular viability and proliferation of ESCC cells, as well as induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis even at low treatment concentrations. The effectiveness was also observed in KYSE150 xenograft model when quisinostat was administered at tolerated doses (3mg/kg and 10mg/kg). Meanwhile, quisinostat also had the ability to suppress the migration and invasion (pivotal steps of tumor metastasis) of ESCC cells. Western blot analysis indicated that quisinostat exerted its anti-ESCC effects mainly through blockade of Akt/mTOR and MAPK/ERK signaling cascades. Overall, HDAC1 may serve as a potential therapeutic target for ESCC, and quisinostat deserves to be further assessed as a promising drug candidate for the treatment of ESCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据