4.1 Article

Estimating and including observation-error correlations in data assimilation

期刊

INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 387-398

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2012.712527

关键词

data assimilation; observation-error covariances; adaptive estimation; observation operator; Shannon entropy

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research under the National Oceanographic Partnership Program [N000141010149]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Usually in data assimilation with geophysical systems, the observation-error covariance matrix R is assumed to be diagonal for simplicity and computational efficiency, although there are studies indicating that several types of satellite observations contain significantly correlated errors. This study brings to light the impact of the off-diagonal terms of R in data assimilation. The adaptive estimation method of Li etal., which allows online estimation of the observation-error variance using innovation statistics, is extended to include off-diagonal terms of R. The extended method performs well with the 40-variable Lorenz model in estimating non-diagonal observation-error covariances. Interestingly, the analysis accuracy is improved when the observation errors are correlated, but only if the observation-error correlations are explicitly considered in data assimilation. Further theoretical considerations relate the impact of observing systems (characterized by both R and an observation operator H) on analysis accuracy. This analysis points out the importance of distinguishing between observation-error correlations (i.e. non-diagonal R) and correlated observations (i.e. non-orthogonal H). In general, observations with a non-diagonal R carry more information, whereas observations with a non-orthogonal H carry less information, but it turns out that the combination of R and H is essential: more information is available from positively (negatively) correlated observations with negatively (positively) correlated errors, resulting in a more accurate analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据