4.7 Article

Phylogeny and biogeography of Ficedula flycatchers (Aves: Muscicapidae): Novel results from fresh source material

期刊

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 87-94

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.029

关键词

Ficedula; Flycatcher; Contamination; Toepad; Biogeography; Migration

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1110619, DEB-1241181, DEB-0743491]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0743491] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1241181] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The avian genus Ficedula has been a model system for studying speciation, genomics, biogeography, and the evolution of migratory behavior. However, no multi-locus molecular phylogenetic hypothesis exists for the genus. We expanded taxon and character sampling over previous studies and produced a robust hypothesis of relationships for the genus. Many previous findings, such as the inclusion of Muscicapella and exclusion of Ficedula monileger from the genus, were verified, but many relationships differed compared to previous work. Some of the differences were due to increased sampling, but others were due to problematic sequence data produced from DNA extracted from historical museum specimens. The new phylogenetic hypothesis resulted in a simpler biogeographic scenario with fewer transitions between regions and fewer transitions between seasonally migratory and resident character states. Notably, all species endemic to the Philippines and Wallacea formed a clade, which included Ficedula dumetoria of the Sunda Shelf and Lesser Sundas. In addition, Ficedula hyperythra was not monophyletic; samples from Philippine populations formed a clade distantly related to a clade that comprised all other sampled populations. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据