4.4 Article

Development of a nomogram to predict non-organ-confined bladder urothelial cancer before radical cystectomy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 1711-1719

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-012-0273-2

关键词

Urinary bladder neoplasms; Nomograms; Neoplasm staging; Cystectomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To create a preoperative prediction model for estimating the risk of non-organ-confined (pT3-4 or pN+) bladder urothelial cancer (NOC-BUC) in patients with clinically OC-BUC (cT1-2N0M0). Methods The study involved 248 consecutive patients who had undergone radical surgery for clinically OC-BUC at a tertiary cancer center between 2003 and 2011. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model for estimating the risk of pathological NOC disease. Prespecified predictors included age, gender, recurrent frequency, tumor size and number, hydronephrosis, and pathological characteristics at transurethral resection (T-stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and carcinoma in situ). Discrimination ability was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Overall, 39.1 % of the patients with clinically OC-BUC had NOC disease at the time of radical surgery. In multivariate analysis, recurrent frequency, tumor size, hydronephrosis, and three pathological features at transurethral resection (T-stage, tumor grade, and LVI) were significantly associated with disease extent. The final prediction model included seven variables after backward elimination and achieved a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.79. Internal validation showed good calibration and clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Conclusions Based on readily available clinicopathological parameters, we developed a nomogram for predicting NOC tumor in clinically OC-BUC. Despite reasonable performance in internal validation, the prediction model should be assessed in external dataset before applied in clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据