4.4 Article

Urine cytokines suggest an inflammatory response in the overactive bladder: a pilot study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 629-635

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-009-9647-5

关键词

Overactive bladder; Urine; Cytokines; Biomarker

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. National Institute on Disability Rehabilitation Research [H133E070024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To study the hypothesis of detecting bladder inflammation associated with overactive bladder (OAB) through altered urine levels of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Methods Midstream urine specimens were collected from a prospective study done on eight asymptomatic control subjects and 17 idiopathic OAB patients. The urine was analyzed by a multiplex panel screen for 12 chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and soluble receptors using Luminex (TM) xMAP (R) technology. Protein concentration values were normalized to the levels of creatinine. Results This analysis revealed a significant elevation of seven key proteins in the urine of OAB patients relative to controls (*P < 0.05). A greater than tenfold elevation was measured in OAB, relative to controls, in the levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), soluble fraction of the CD40 ligand (sCD40L) in urine was obtained from OAB patients relative to controls. At least five fold elevations were detected in the levels of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP-1 beta), IL-12p70/p40, IL-5, epidermal growth factor (EGF), and growth-related oncogene GRO-alpha compared to controls. Significant threefold elevation was also noticed in the urine levels of sIL-2R alpha, and IL-10 in the OAB group. The levels of the remaining proteins tested were not statistically significantly different from control values. Conclusions The presence of elevated levels in urine of inflammatory biomarkers involved in inflammation and tissue repair suggests a role for inflammation in OAB, and may help in diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据