4.7 Article

Thermosensitive, Near-Infrared-Labeled Nanoparticles for Topotecan Delivery to Tumors

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 1335-1346

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp5002679

关键词

thermosensitive liposomes; topotecan; anticancer; focused ultrasound; multispectral fluorescence imaging

资金

  1. EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, U.K.)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I001700/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/I001700/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liposomal nanoparticles have proven to be versatile systems for drug delivery. However, the progress in clinic has been slower and less efficient than expected. This suggests a need for further development using carefully designed chemical components to improve usefulness under clinical conditions and maximize therapeutic effect. For cancer chemotherapy, PEGylated liposomes were the first nano-medicine to reach the market and have been used clinically for several years. Approaches toward targeted drug delivery using next generation thermally triggered nanoparticles are now in clinical trials. However, clinically tested thermosensitive liposomes (TSLs) lack the markers that allow tumor labeling improved imaging for tissue specific applied hyperthernia. Here we describe the development of optically labeled TSLs for image guidance drug delivery and proof-of-concept results for their application in the treatment of murine xenograft tumors using the anticancer drug topotecan. These labeled TSLs also allow the simultaneous, real-time diagnostic imaging of nanoparticle biodistribution using a near-infrared (NIR; 750-950 nm) fluorophore coupled to a lipidic component of the lipid bilayer. When combined with multispectral fluorescence analysis, this allows for specific and high sensitivity tracking of the nanoparticles in vivo. The application of NIR fluorescence-labeled TSLs could have a transformative effect on future cancer chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据