4.7 Article

Novel Bifunctional Cyclic Chelator for 89Zr Labeling-Radiolabeling and Targeting Properties of RGD Conjugates

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 2142-2150

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00128

关键词

fusarinine C; triacetylfusarinine C; Zr-89; RGD peptide; positron emission tomography (PET)

资金

  1. Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) [P 25899-B23]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P25899] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the last years Zr-89 has attracted considerable attention as long-lived radionuclide for positron emission tomography (PET) applications. So far desferrioxamine B (DFO) has been mainly used as bifunctional chelating system. Fusarinine C (FSC), having complexing properties comparable to DFO, was expected to be an alternative with potentially higher stability due to its cyclic structure. In this study, as proof of principle, various FSC-RGD conjugates targeting alpha(v)beta(3) integrins were synthesized using different conjugation strategies and labeled with Zr-89. In vitro stability, biodistribution, and microPET/CT imaging were evaluated using [Zr-89]FSC-RGD conjugates or [Zr-89]triacetylfusarinine C (TAFC). Quantitative Zr-89 labeling was achieved within 90 min at room temperature. The distribution coefficients of the different radioligands indicate hydrophilic character. Compared to [Zr-89]DFO, [Zr-89]FSC derivatives showed excellent in vitro stability and resistance against transchelation in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution (EDTA), and human serum for up to 7 days. Cell binding studies and biodistribution as well as microPET/CT imaging experiments showed efficient receptor-specific targeting of [Zr-89]FSC-RGD conjugates. No bone uptake was observed analyzing PET images indicating high in vivo stability. These findings indicate that FSC is a highly promising chelator for the development of Zr-89-based PET imaging agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据