期刊
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 523-528出版社
SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5
关键词
Construct validity; Global index; Outcome assessment; Prolapse; PGI-I; Reliability
Currently, there is no global outcome assessment index in prolapse research. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) has only been validated in incontinence. Our aim was to validate its use following prolapse surgery. Women with prolapse were recruited from waiting lists and assessed objectively (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q)). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed with prolapse QoL questionnaire (pQoL). Patient goal achievement (visual analogue scale (VAS)) determined subjective satisfaction and PGI-I indicated overall satisfaction. We established construct validity of PGI-I by correlating final PGI-I response with other measures of response, measured at 1 year: (POP-Q/pQoL/VAS) There was excellent test-retest reliability and correlation between PGI-I and other outcome measures. We believe this is the first study validating PGI-I as a global index of response to prolapse surgery. This may be a valuable addition not only in clinical practice but also in trials comparing surgical interventions.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据