4.7 Article

Impact of C4'-O-Alkyl Linker on in Vivo Pharmacokinetics of Near-Infrared Cyanine/Monoclonal Antibody Conjugates

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 3303-3311

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00472

关键词

cyanine; in vivo imaging; near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores; monoclonal antibody (mAb) conjugates

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research
  2. Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores have several advantages over visible-light fluorophores, including superior tissue penetration and lower autofluorescence. We recently accessed a new class of readily synthesized NIR cyanines containing a novel C4'-O-alkyl linker, which provides both high chemical stability and excellent optical properties. In this study, we provide the first in vivo analysis of this new class of compounds, represented by the tetrasulfonate FNIR-774 (Frederick NIR 774). Monoclonal antibody (mAb) conjugates of FNIR-774 were compared to conjugates of the commercially available dye (IRDye800CW (IR800)), one of the most widely used NIR fluorophores for clinical translation. Both dyes were conjugated to panitumumab (pan) or cetuximab (cet) with ratios of 1:2 or 1:5. Conjugates of both dyes demonstrated similar quenching capacity, stability, and brightness in target cells in vitro. In contrast, in vivo imaging in mice showed different pharmacokinetics between pan-FNIR-774 (1:5) and pan-IR800 (1:5), or cet-FNIR-774 (1:5) and cet-IR800 (1:5). Particularly at the higher labeling density, mAb-FNIR-774 conjugates showed superior specific accumulation in tumors compared with mAb-IR800 conjugates. Thus, FNIR-774 conjugates showed superior in vivo pharmacokinetics compared with IR800 conjugates, independent of the mAb. These results suggest that FNIR-774 is a promising fluorescent probe for NIB. optical imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据