4.5 Article

APOE ε4 and the risk for Alzheimer disease and cognitive decline in African Americans and Yoruba

期刊

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 977-985

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610214000167

关键词

APOE epsilon 4; African Americans; cognitive impairment; Alzheimer disease; Yoruba

资金

  1. NIH [RO1 AG09956, P30 AG10133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is little information on the association of the APOEe4 allele and AD risk in African populations. In previous analyses from the Indianapolis-Ibadan dementia project, we have reported that APOE epsilon 4 increased the risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in African Americans but not in Yoruba. This study represents a replication of this earlier work using enriched cohorts and extending the analysis to include cognitive decline. Methods: In this longitudinal study of two community dwelling cohorts of elderly Yoruba and African Americans, APOE genotyping was conducted from blood samples taken on or before 2001 (1,871 African Americans & 2,200 Yoruba). Mean follow up time was 8.5 years for African Americans and 8.8 years for Yoruba. The effects of heterozygosity or homozygosity of epsilon 4 and of the possession of e4 on time to incident AD and on cognitive decline were determined using Cox's proportional hazards regression and mixed effects models. Results: After adjusting for covariates, one or two copies of the APOE epsilon 4 allele were significant risk factors for incident AD (p < 0.0001) and cognitive decline in the African-American population (p < 0001). In the Yoruba, only homozygosity for APOE epsilon 4 was a significant risk factor for AD (p = 0.0002) but not for cognitive decline (p = 0.2346), however, possession of an e4 allele was significant for both incident AD (p = 0.0489) and cognitive decline (p = 0.0425). Conclusions: In this large longitudinal comparative study, APOE epsilon 4 had a significant, but weaker, effect on incident AD and on cognitive decline in Yoruba than in African Americans. The reasons for these differences remain unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据