4.5 Article

Sleep quality in caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease and its relationship to quality of life

期刊

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 1827-1835

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610212001032

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Parkinson's disease; neurodegenerative disorders; caregivers; sleep; depression; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Knowledge about sleep complaints of caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) is limited, and we lack information about the relationship between caregivers' sleep problems and their quality of life (QoL). Methods: We evaluated subjective sleep quality and its relationship to QoL in a group of 80 caregivers of patients with AD (ADCG, n = 40) and PD (PDCG, n = 40), and in 150 controls. Information about night-time complaints was collected using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). QoL was measured using the McGill QoL Questionnaire. Results: Eighteen ADCG (45%), 22 PDCG (55%), and 45 (30%) controls reported poor sleep quality. Mean global PSQI score of PDCG (6.25 +/- 3.9) was not significantly different from that of ADCG (5.8 +/- 3.5; p = 0.67). However, both PDCG and ADCG scored significantly higher than control group (4.3 +/- 3.1; p < 0.01). ADCG frequently reported difficulties falling asleep (72.5%) and disturbed sleep (100%). PDCG reported reduced subjective sleep quality (80%) and increased sleep disturbances (100%). Poor sleep quality was associated with depressive symptoms and correlated with QoL in caregivers of both groups, particularly the psychological symptoms domain. Conclusions: Among caregivers of patients with AD and PD, poor sleep quality is frequent and significantly linked to QoL and depressive symptoms. Identifying the nature of sleep disturbances not only in patients but also in their caregivers is important as appropriate treatment may lead to a better management of the needs of families coping with these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据