4.5 Article

Gait knee kinematic alterations in medial osteoarthritis: three dimensional assessment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 1191-1198

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2312-3

关键词

Knee osteoarthritis; Kinematics; Gait; In vivo assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Although kinematic changes in the sagittal plane of the osteoarthritic knee (OA) have been elucidated, very few studies have analysed changes in the frontal and horizontal planes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate in vivo 3D knee kinematics during walking in patients wth knee OA. Methods Thirty patients with medial knee OA and a control group of similarly aged individuals were prospectively collected for this study. All participants were assessed with KneeKG (TM) system while walking on a treadmill at a self-selected speed. In each trial, we calculated the angular displacment of flexion/extension, abduction/adduction and external/internal tibial rotation. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences between the knee OA group and the control group. Results Patients with knee OA had reduced extension during the stance phase (p<0.05; 8.5 degrees and 4.4 degrees, OA and control group, respectively) and reduced flexion during pushoff and initial swing phase (p <0.05; 41.9 degrees and 49.4 degrees, respectively). Adduction angle was consistently greater for OA patients (p <0.05; 3.4 degrees and -0.9 degrees, respectively). Frontal laxity for OA patients was positively correlated with varus deformity (r=0.42, p<0.05). There was a significant difference (p) <0.05 in tibial rotation during the midstance phase; OA patients retained a neutral position (-0.4 degrees), while the control group presented internal tibial rotation (-2.2 degrees). Conclusion Weight-bearing kinematics in medial OA knees differs from that of normal knees. The knee OA group showed an altered screw-home mechanism by decreased excursion in sagittal and axial tibial rotation and posterior tibial translation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据