4.5 Article

Interleukin-6 and other inflammatory markers in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

期刊

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 2591-2595

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2475-y

关键词

Periprosthetic joint infection; Knee/hip arthroplasty; Interleukin-6; C-reactive protein; White blood cell count; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and other inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell count (WCC) in diagnosis of PJI. Methods The study group included 40 patients (21 males, 19 females) admitted for surgical intervention after knee or hip arthroplasties. Patients were subjected to careful history taking, thorough clinical examination and pre-operative laboratory investigations including serum IL-6, CRP, WCC and ESR. Peri-implant tissue specimens were subjected to microbiological culture and histopathological examination. Results The mean age of patients was 58.4 years (range, 38-72 years). Intra-operative cultures and histopathological examination revealed 11 patients had been infected (PJI) and 29 patients were aseptic failure of prosthesis. Four presumed markers of infection were tested preoperatively: ESR, CRP, WCC, and IL-6. ESR (p = 0.0001), CRP (p = 0.004), WCC (0.0001), and IL-6 (p = 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients with septic revision than those with aseptic failure of the prosthesis. Serum IL-6 (> 10.4 pg/ml) reportedly had a sensitivity of 100 %, a specificity of 90.9 %, a PPV of 79 %, a NPV of 100 %, and accuracy of 92.5 %. Conclusions The present study demonstrated that IL-6 has been found to be the most accurate laboratory marker for diagnosing PJI when compared to ESR, CRP, and WCC. IL-6 above 10.4 pg/ml and CRP level above 18 mg/L will identify all patients with PJI and the combination of CRP + IL-6 is an excellent screening test to identify all such patients (sensitivity 100 %, NPV 100 %).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据