4.7 Article

Absorption and chemopreventive targets of sulforaphane in humans following consumption of broccoli sprouts or a myrosinase-treated broccoli sprout extract

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 424-433

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201400674

关键词

Absorption; Broccoli sprout; Chemoprevention; Excretion; Sulforaphane

资金

  1. Linus Pauling Institute
  2. Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing Core Facilities
  3. Mass Spectrometry Lab at Oregon State University
  4. National Institutes of Health [CA090890, CA122906]
  5. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P30 ES000210]
  6. Oregon Agricultural Experimental Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope: Sulforaphane (SFN), an isothiocyanate derived from crucifers, has numerous health benefits. SFN bioavailability from dietary sources is a critical determinant of its efficacy in humans. A key factor in SFN absorption is the release of SFN from its glucosinolate precursor, glucoraphanin, by myrosinase. Dietary supplements are used in clinical trials to deliver consistent SFN doses, but myrosinase is often inactivated in available supplements. We evaluated SFN absorption from a myrosinase-treated broccoli sprout extract (BSE) and are the first to report effects of twice daily, oral dosing on SFN exposure in healthy adults. Methods and results: Subjects consumed fresh broccoli sprouts or the BSE, each providing 200 mu mol SFN daily, as a single dose and as two 100-mu mol doses taken 12 h apart. Using HPLC-MS/MS, we detected similar to 3 x higher SFN metabolite levels in plasma and urine of sprout consumers, indicating enhanced SFN absorption from sprouts. Twelve-hour dosing retained higher plasma SFN metabolite levels at later time points than 24-hour dosing. No dose responses were observed for molecular targets of SFN (i.e. heme oxygenase-1, histone deacetylase activity, p21). Conclusion: We conclude that the dietary form and dosing schedule of SFN may impact SFN absorption and efficacy in human trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据