4.7 Article

Isothiocyanate-rich Moringa oleifera extract reduces weight gain, insulin resistance, and hepatic gluconeogenesis in mice

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 1013-1024

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201400679

关键词

Diabetes; Insulin resistance; Isothiocyanates; Moringa oleifera; Obesity

资金

  1. Botanical Research Center Pilot Program from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) [5P50AT002776-08 S12-50318, P50AT002776-01]
  2. Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS)
  3. NIH [T32:5T32AT004094-04, 1 U54 GM104940]
  4. Ecuadorian government [SENESCYT-2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ScopeMoringa oleifera (moringa) is tropical plant traditionally used as an antidiabetic food. It produces structurally unique and chemically stable moringa isothiocyanates (MICs) that were evaluated for their therapeutic use in vivo. Methods and resultsC57BL/6L mice fed very high fat diet (VHFD) supplemented with 5% moringa concentrate (MC, delivering 66 mg/kg/d of MICs) accumulated fat mass, had improved glucose tolerance and insulin signaling, and did not develop fatty liver disease compared to VHFD-fed mice. MC-fed group also had reduced plasma insulin, leptin, resistin, cholesterol, IL-1, TNF, and lower hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase (G6P) expression. In hepatoma cells, MC and MICs at low micromolar concentrations inhibited gluconeogenesis and G6P expression. MICs and MC effects on lipolysis in vitro and on thermogenic and lipolytic genes in adipose tissue in vivo argued these are not likely primary targets for the anti-obesity and anti-diabetic effects observed. ConclusionData suggest that MICs are the main anti-obesity and anti-diabetic bioactives of MC, and that they exert their effects by inhibiting rate-limiting steps in liver gluconeogenesis resulting in direct or indirect increase in insulin signaling and sensitivity. These conclusions suggest that MC may be an effective dietary food for the prevention and treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据