4.7 Article

Consumption of polyunsaturated fat improves the saturated fatty acid-mediated impairment of HDL antioxidant potential

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 10, 页码 1987-1996

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201500336

关键词

HDL; Oxidation; Reverse cholesterol transport; Saturated fatty acids; Polyunsaturated fatty acids

资金

  1. European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action [BM0904]
  2. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS 12-00291, PI13-00364]
  4. Fondos FEDER
  5. Academy of Finland [257545]
  6. Miguel Servet Type 1 contract [CP13-00070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope: The present study aimed to compare the effects of diets containing high-fat, high-cholesterol and saturated fatty acids (HFHC-SFA) and HFHC-polyunsaturated fatty acids-containing (HFHC-PUFA) diets on two major antiatherogenic functions of HDL, the HDL antioxidant function and the macrophage-to-feces reverse cholesterol transport. Methods and results: Experiments were carried out in mice fed a low-fat, low-cholesterol (LFLC) diet, an HFHC-SFA diet or an HFHC-PUFA diet in which SFAs were partly replaced with an alternative high-linoleic and alpha-linolenic fat source. The HFHC-SFA caused a significant increase in serum HDL cholesterol and phospholipids as well as elevated levels of oxidized HDL and oxidized LDL. Replacing SFA with PUFA significantly reduced the levels of these oxidized lipoproteins and enhanced the ability of HDL to protect LDL from oxidation. The SFA-mediated impairment of HDL antioxidant potential was not associated with the cholesterol content of the diet, obesity or insulin resistance. In contrast, the effect of the HFHC diets on fecal macrophage-derived cholesterol excretion was independent of the fatty acid source. Conclusion: SFA intake impairs the antioxidant potential of HDL and increases serum levels of oxidized lipoprotein species whereas the antioxidant potential of HDL is enhanced after PUFA consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据