4.5 Article

Charred wood remaining after a wildfire as a reservoir of macro- and micronutrients in a Mediterranean pine forest

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 681-695

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF12030

关键词

forest management; Mediterranean mountain; post-fire salvage logging; silvicultural treatments; soil nutrients; wood nutrients; woody debris

类别

资金

  1. INIA [SUM2006-00010-00-00]
  2. Organismo Autonomo de Parques Nacionales (MMA)
  3. GESBOME of the Junta de Andalucia [P06-RNM-1890]
  4. COILEX [CGL2008-01671]
  5. CARBORED-II [CGL2010-22193-C04-02]
  6. MICINN [PTA2009-1782-I]
  7. FPU-MEC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large amounts of logs and coarse woody debris remain in the ecosystem after wildfires. However, the relevance of the nutrient reservoir contained in the remaining post-fire woody debris for the ecosystem nutrient reserves is rarely considered. In this paper, we determine the carbon and nutrient concentrations in the partially charred wood after a wildfire along an altitudinal gradient and assess the relative magnitude of the nutrient reservoir in the wood in relation to those existing in the first 10-cm soil layer. Soils were poorly developed and nutrients limiting for the vegetation requirements. Charred woody material still contained a relatively high concentration of nutrients compared to those reported for unburnt pine wood, and in general, this decreased with altitude. Partially charred wood represented a considerable pool of nutrients, due to both the relatively high concentrations and to the great amount of biomass still present after the fire. Potential contributions of the charred wood were particularly relevant for N and micronutrients Na, Mn, Fe, Zn and Cu, as wood contained 2-9 times more nutrients than the soil. Post-fire woody debris constitutes therefore a valuable natural element as a potential source of nutrients, which would be lost from ecosystems in cases where it is removed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据