4.3 Review

Endothelial dysfunction and erectile dysfunction in the aging man

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 38-47

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02426.x

关键词

cardiovascular risk factors; endothelial dysfunction; erectile dysfunction; nitric oxide; phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Penile erection is a vascular event that requires an intact endothelium to occur. A dysfunctional endothelium is an early marker for the development of atherosclerotic changes and can also contribute to the occurrence of acute cardiovascular events. The pathogenesis of both endothelial and erectile dysfunction (ED) is intimately linked through decreased expression and activation of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase, and the subsequent blunted physiological actions of NO naturally occurring with aging. It is now well-understood that ED is a symptom of underlying disease rather than a disease itself; for this reason in the near future both general practitioners, internal medicine practitioners and many specialists will have to interplay with sexual medicine. Aging in the man is also associated with several changes in arterial structure and function, part of them related to the decline of circulating levels of steroids, that is, testosterone and estradiol. These changes may be responsible, in part, for the lack of efficacy of ED treatments. The recent discovery that chronic administration of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors may improve erectile and endothelial responsiveness of men previously non-responsive to on-demand regimes, and the knowledge that testosterone is one of the main modulators of the expression of penile phosphodiesterase type 5 isoenzyme, opens a new scenario in the treatment of men with ED and co-morbidities. The aim of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction and its relationship with ED in the aging male, and to suggest possible strategies to improve arterial function with regard to sexual dysfunctions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据