4.3 Article

Prospective comparative study of single dose versus 3-day administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis in minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 328-331

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02001.x

关键词

antimicrobial prophylaxis; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; remote infection; surgical site infection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: From the critical stand point against the overuse of antimicrobial agents, appropriate reduction of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) should be considered. We have prospectively reduced AMP and evaluated the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) by minimum incision endoscopic surgery (MIES). Methods: A total of 101 consecutive patients who underwent MIES-RRP for prostate carcinoma were classified into two groups according to AMP dose. The 3-day group of 52 patients received tazobactam sodium/piperacillin sodium (TAZ/PIPC) 2.5 g intravenously before the operation and continued twice daily until postoperative day 2, and the single dose group of 49 patients received TAZ/PIPC 2.5 g intravenously only once before the operation. Additional antimicrobial agents were given only when SSI occurred. The occurrence of SSI and remote infection (RI) were analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of SSI occurrence between the 3-day group (3.8%) and single dose group (6.1%) (P = 0.6). RI did not increase in the single dose group. Conclusion: Antimicrobial prophylaxis dose was successfully reduced without increasing SSI or RI. A single dose of AMP is feasible to prevent SSI and RI and would be a standard regimen in MIES-RRP. Active surveillance of postoperative infection is mandatory to promptly administer antimicrobial treatment as the need arises.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据