4.5 Article

The nuclease activities of both the Smr domain and an additional LDLK motif are required for an efficient anti-recombination function of Helicobacter pyloriMutS2

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 96, 期 6, 页码 1240-1256

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [37 (1502)/11/EMR-II]
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-09-BLAN-0271-01]
  3. INSERM
  4. DST
  5. IISc fellowship
  6. CEA
  7. IISc
  8. CSIR-SRF fellowship
  9. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0271] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Helicobacter pylori, a human pathogen, is a naturally and constitutively competent bacteria, displaying a high rate of intergenomic recombination. While recombination events are essential for evolution and adaptation of H.pylori to dynamic gastric niches and new hosts, such events should be regulated tightly to maintain genomic integrity. Here, we analyze the role of the nuclease activity of MutS2, a protein that limits recombination during transformation in H.pylori. In previously studied MutS2 proteins, the C-terminal Smr domain was mapped as the region responsible for its nuclease activity. We report here that deletion of Smr domain does not completely abolish the nuclease activity of HpMutS2. Using bioinformatics analysis and mutagenesis, we identified an additional and novel nuclease motif (LDLK) at the N-terminus of HpMutS2 unique to Helicobacter and related epsilon-proteobacterial species. A single point mutation (D30A) in the LDLK motif and the deletion of Smr domain resulted in approximate to 5-10-fold loss of DNA cleavage ability of HpMutS2. Interestingly, the mutant forms of HpMutS2 wherein the LDLK motif was mutated or the Smr domain was deleted were unable to complement the hyper-recombination phenotype of a mutS2(-) strain, suggesting that both nuclease sites are indispensable for an efficient anti-recombinase activity of HpMutS2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据