4.7 Article

Passive thermal management of tablet PCs using phase change materials: Continuous operation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 101-115

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.08.010

关键词

Phase change materials; Thin thermal storage solution; Temperature management; Modern portable electronics

资金

  1. Intel Corporation
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Nova Scotia Government (Graduate Scholarship program)
  4. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tablet computers (PCs) are continuously moving towards light, thin, and small shape factors to achieve an eye appealing design while providing extreme mobility. The increased integration of electronic components with high power density, smaller size, and more compact layout is leading to exceptionally high operating temperatures for tablet PCs. This research focuses on development of an inexpensive and practical solution for thermal management for tablet PCs using phase change materials (PCMs) encapsulated in thin aluminized laminated film. In this paper, the performance of the tablet PC with this PCM thermal energy storage (TES) unit under continuous operation was investigated. PT-37, a commercial PCM from PureTemp, and n-eicosane were used as PCMs, as they have been shown to be safe and relatively inexpensive, and have melting temperatures in the range suitable for thermal management of portable electronics such as tablet PCs. It was found that the insertion of the thin PCM-based TES system within that tablet PC resulted in a reduction of the rate of temperature increase, for both the electronics and the tablet cover, during the transient start-up phase of operation; leading ultimately, to lower operating temperature of the entire tablet. Findings from this research confirm that the implementation of PCM based TES unit is a viable option for thermal management of tablet PCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据