4.7 Article

Dynamic performance analysis on start-up of closed-loop pulsating heat pipes (CLPHPs)

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 224-233

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.10.012

关键词

Closed-loop pulsating heat pipe (CLPHP); Start-up performance; System identification theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11190015]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110092110049]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011062]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The control theory (system identification theory) is introduced to quantitatively analyze the start-up performance of the closed-loop pulsating heat pipes (CLPHPs) based on an experimental investigation with various working fluids under different working conditions. A preliminary dynamic relationship between the 'input' (heat load) and 'output' (evaporator temperature) and corresponding six evaluation criteria are proposed to realize the quantitative characterization of the dynamic performance of two most common types of start-up, respectively, which provide a prerequisite for the further simulation and control design of the CLPHPs' start-up. Based on such analysis, it is indicated that the optimal liquid filling ratio for start-up is about 41% for water, 52% for ethanol, and falls within the range from 35% to 41% for methanol. The start-up performance is improved with increasing inclination angle from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. With the increasing heat load, a faster start-up speed and a better relative stability are observed while the start-up temperature is increased. Moreover, the working fluid with small dynamic viscosity, small specific heat, and especially large saturation pressure gradient versus temperature is beneficial to the start-up performance of the CLPHPs. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据