4.7 Article

Analysis of transient thermo-elastic problems using edge-based smoothed finite element method

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 127-135

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.10.007

关键词

Numerical method; ES-FEM; NS-PIM; Smoothed Galerkin weak form; Thermo-elastic

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11002053]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB328005]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology [GZ1212]
  4. Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body [51075005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-FEM) is extended to deal with the transient thermoelastic problems. For this edge-based smoothed finite element method, the problem domain is first discretized into a set of triangular elements, and the edge-based smoothing domains are further formed along the edges of the triangular meshes. In order to improve the accuracy, the ES-FEM utilizes the smoothed Galerkin weak form to obtain the discretized system equations in smoothing domains, in which the gradient field is obtained using a gradient smoothing operation. After applying these approaches, the numerical integration becomes a simple summation over each edge-based smoothing domain. The transient thermo-elastic problem is decoupled into two separate parts. At first, the temperature field is acquired by solving the transient heat transfer problem and it is then employed as an input for the mechanical problem to calculate the displacement and stress fields. Several numerical examples with different kinds of boundary conditions are investigated. It has been found that ES-FEM can achieve better accuracy and higher convergence in energy norm than the finite element method (FEM) when using the same triangular mesh. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据