4.7 Article

Boundary layer flow and heat transfer over an exponentially shrinking vertical sheet with suction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 264-272

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.08.016

关键词

Exponentially shrinking; Mixed convection; Vertical; Suction; Triple solutions

资金

  1. Universiti Utara Malaysia
  2. Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education
  3. RU Grant from Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) [1001/PMATHS/811166]
  4. RU Grant from Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education [FRGS (203/PMATHS/6711234)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we investigate theoretically the problem of steady laminar two-dimensional boundary layer flow and heat transfer of an incompressible viscous fluid in the presence of buoyancy force over an exponentially shrinking vertical sheet with suction. The shrinking velocity and wall temperature are assumed to have specific exponential function forms. The governing equations are first transformed to similarity equations using an appropriate similarity transformation. The resulting equations were then solved numerically using shooting technique involving fourth-order Runge-Kutta method and Newton-Raphson method. The influence of mixed convection/buoyancy parameter lambda, suction parameter s and Prandtl number Pr on the flow and heat transfer characteristics is examined and discussed. Numerical results indicate that the presence of buoyancy force would contribute to the existence of triple solutions to the flow and heat transfer for particular value of pertinent parameters. It is different for the non-buoyant flow case i.e. when the buoyancy force is absent, the problem admits only dual solutions. Further, this study also reveals that the features of flow and heat transfer characteristics are significantly affected by buoyancy parameter lambda, suction parameter s and Prandtl number Pr. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据