4.7 Article

Performance evaluation of solar air heater having expanded metal mesh as artificial roughness on absorber plate

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 1007-1016

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.08.011

关键词

Solar air heater; Expanded metal mesh; Roughness geometry parameter; Energy augmentation ratio; Effective energy augmentation ratio; Exergy augmentation ratio; Reynolds number

资金

  1. Ujjain Engineering College, Ujjain, M.P. (India)
  2. IIT Delhi (India)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A parametric study of artificial roughness geometry of expanded metal mesh type in the absorber plate of solar air heater duct has been carried out and compared with smooth duct. The performance evaluation in terms of energy augmentation ratio (EAR), effective energy augmentation ratio (EEAR) and exergy augmentation ratio (EXAR) has been carried out for various values of Reynolds number (Re) and roughness parameters of expanded metal mesh roughness geometry in the absorber plate of solar air heater duct. It is found that the augmentation ratios decrease at faster rate with Re in the order of EAR, EEAR and EXAR. It is also found that augmentation ratios increase with increase in duct depth and intensity of solar radiation. The artificially roughened solar air heater duct performs better as per EAR or heat energy gain criteria for any values of Re and roughness parameters of expanded metal mesh. The EAR is high for the parameters of expanded metal mesh type roughness geometry which create more turbulence, however the pump work required for flow of air will also increase. The FAAR is a more suitable criterion to incorporate the quality of heat collected and pump work required. The EXAR is more for higher duct depth and low Re range. Based on EXAR the suitable design parameters of expanded metal mesh roughness geometry are determined. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据