4.5 Article

Ischemic postconditioning inhibits apoptosis in an in vitro proximal tubular cell model

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 99-104

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3344

关键词

kidney; ischemic postconditioning; in vitro model; apoptosis; caspase cascade

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901494, 30901552, 2013RMFH012]
  2. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2009CDB382]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ischemia-reperfusion is a common injury of clinical ischemic disease and surgical lesions. Ischemic postconditioning (IPO) improves the ability of organs subjected to ischemia to tolerate injury. However, renal IPO studies have been based on animal models. In order to gain insights into IPO-induced alterations at the cellular level, an in vitro model for IPO was designed using the rat proximal tubular cell line NRK-52E. This model was established by placing NRK-52E cells in ischemic conditions for 3 h, then exposing cells to three cycles of reperfusion for 10 min and finally to ischemic conditions for 10 min (postconditioning). The cells were cultured further in reperfusion conditions for 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. Flow cytometry and Hoechst were used to assess apoptosis. The protein expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-8 were analyzed by western blotting. The results demonstrated that apoptosis occurred in cells subjected to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) alone or with postconditioning following reperfusion for 24 h. Cells subjected to I/R demonstrated increased expression of Bax, cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-8 at the end of reperfusion. However, the levels of Bax, cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-8 were significantly attenuated in cells, which had undergone IPO. In conclusion, apoptosis was observed in cells subjected to 3 h of ischemia-reperfusion injury and IPO was able to inhibit this apoptosis. IPO inhibited apoptosis by inhibiting the caspase pathway thereby exerting protective effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据