4.4 Article

Phaeospirillum tilakii sp nov., a phototrophic alphaproteobacterium isolated from aquatic sediments

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.032250-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Department of Biotechnology, Government of India
  2. JNTU, Hyderabad
  3. CSIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two strains (JA492(T) and JA590) of spiral-shaped, anaerobic, Gram-stain-negative, motile, purple non-sulfur bacteria were isolated from aquatic sediments from a bird sanctuary and a stream, respectively, and were characterized by a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Bacteriochlorophyll a and carotenoids (rhodopin, lycopene, hydroxylycopene glucoside and dihydroxylycopene diglucoside) were present as photosynthetic pigments. Intracellular photosynthetic membranes were of the stacked type. The major fatty acids were C-18:1 omega 7C(1) C-16:0 and summed feature 3 (C-16:1 omega 6c and/or C-16:1 omega 7c) in both strains. Ubiquinones and menaquinones were present as major quinone components. The genomic DNA G + C contents of strains JA492(T) and JA590 were 63.8 and 61.5 mol%, respectively. Both strains were closely related (mean DNA-DNA hybridization >70%). Phylogenetic analysis showed that the strains clustered with species of the genus Phaeospirillum of the family Rhodospirillaceae, class Alpha proteobacteria. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, both strains showed highest sequence similarity with Phaeospirillum oryzae JA317(T) (97.2-97.4 %), Phaeospirillum molischianum DSM 120(T) (96.5-96.7%), Phaeospirillum fulvum DSM 113(T) (96.7-96.9%) and Phaeospirillum chandramohanii JA145(T) (96.5-96.7%). DNA DNA relatedness between strain JA492(T) and its closest relative in the genus Phaeospirillum was less than 42%. It is evident from phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and molecular genetic data that strain JA492(T) represents a novel species of the genus Phaeospirillum, for which the name Phaeospirillum tilakii sp. nov. is proposed; the type strain is JA492(T) (=NBRC 107650(T)=KCTC 15012(T)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据