4.5 Article

Activation of calcium-sensing receptor increases TRPC3/6 expression in T lymphocyte in sepsis

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 18-25

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.10.018

关键词

Calcium-sensing receptor; Transient receptor potential channel; Sepsis; Lymphocytes; Cytokine

资金

  1. projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101315, 81371892]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome induced by infection. T Lymphocytes play an important role in this disease. Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and calcium-sensing receptors (CaSR) are expressed in lymphocytes to promote intracellular Ca2+ release. However, data about the link between CaSR and TRP channels in septic T lymphocytes are few. In this study, by Ca2+ imaging and Western blotting, we found that in septic rat peripheral blood T lymphocytes expressions of TRPC3 and TRPC6 proteins are higher. The SR/ER Ca2+ ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin (TG) and CaSR agonist NPS R-568 also increased expressions of TRPC3 and TRPC6 proteins, which were reversed by PLC-IP3 channel blocker U73122 and TRPC channels inhibitor SKF96365. By Ca2+ imaging, we found that the depletion of ER Ca2+ stores by TG elicited a transient rise in cytoplasmic Ca2+, followed by sustained increase depending on extracellular Ca2+. But, SKF96365, not Verapamil (L-type channels inhibitor) and NiCl2 (Na+/Ca2+ exchanger inhibitor), inhibited the relatively high [Ca2+](i). NPS R-568 also resulted in the same effect, and the duration of [Ca2+]; increase was eliminated completely by U73122 and was reduced in the absence of [Ca2+](o). NPS R-568 and TG increased the apoptotic ratio of septic T lymphocytes, which can be suppressed by SKF96365 and U73122. These results suggested that CaSR activation promoted the expression of TRPC3 and TRPC6 and enhanced T lymphocytes apoptosis through PLC-IP3 signaling pathway in sepsis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据