4.4 Article

Allometric Multilevel Modelling of Agility and Dribbling Speed by Skeletal Age and Playing Position in Youth Soccer Players

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 762-771

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1358469

关键词

youth sport; adolescence; longitudinal analysis; allometry; maturation; skills

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/64648/2009, SFRH/BD/72111/2010]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/64648/2009, SFRH/BD/72111/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the contributions of age, skeletal maturation, body size and composition, training and playing position to the development of agility and dribbling speed in young male soccer players (10-18 years) followed longitudinally. 83 players [defenders (n = 35), midfielders (n = 27), forwards (n = 21)] were followed annually over 5 years (average: 4.4 observations per player). Skeletal age (SA), stature, body mass, triceps and subscapular skinfolds, agility and dribbling speed were measured annually. Body composition was estimated from the 2 skinfolds. Annual training volume was estimated from weekly participation forms completed by coaches. The multiplicative allometric models with the best statistical fit showed that statural growth of 1 cm predicts 1.334s and 1.927s of improvement in agility and dribbling speed, respectively. Significant independent effects of fat-free mass and annual volume training were found for agility and dribbling speed, respectively (P < 0.05). Predicted agility (from 12 to 18 years of SA) and dribbling speed (from 13 to 18 years of SA) differed significantly among players by playing positions (midfielders > forwards > defenders). The present results provide developmental models for the interpretation of intra-and inter-individual variability in agility and dribbling speed among youth soccer players across adolescence, and may provide a framework for trainers and coaches to develop and evaluate individualized training protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据