4.2 Article

Opuntia Ficus-Indica Ingestion Stimulates Peripheral Disposal of Oral Glucose Before and After Exercise in Healthy Men

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.22.4.284

关键词

nutritional supplements; postexercise recovery; insulinogenic; blood glucose clearance

资金

  1. PhytoLab GmbH & Co. KG, Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Opuntia ficus-indica (OFI) cladode and fruit-skin extract on blood glucose and plasma insulin increments due to high-dose carbohydrate ingestion, before and after exercise. Healthy, physically active men (n = 6; 21.0 +/- 1.6 years, 78.1 +/- 6.0 kg) participated in a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study involving 2 experimental sessions. In each session, the subjects successively underwent an oral glucose tolerance test at rest (OGTT(R)), a 30-min cycling bout at similar to 75% VO2max, and another OGTT after exercise (OGTT(EX)). They received capsules containing either 1,000 mg OFI or placebo (PL) 30 min before and immediately after the OGTT(R). Blood samples were collected before (t(0)) and at 30-min intervals after ingestion of 75 g glucose for determination of blood glucose and serum insulin. In OGTT(EX) an additional 75-g oral glucose bolus was administered at t(60). In OGTT(R), OFI administration reduced the area under the glucose curve (AUC(GLUC)) by 26%, mainly due to lower blood glucose levels at t(30) and t(60) (p < .05). Furthermore, a higher serum insulin concentration was noted after OFI intake at baseline and at t(30) (p < .05). In OGTT(EX), blood glucose at t(60) was similar to 10% lower in OFI than in PL, which resulted in a decreased AUC(GLUC) (-37%, p < .05). However, insulin values and AUC(INS) were not different between OFI and PL. In conclusion, the current study shows that OFI extract can increase plasma insulin and thereby facilitate the clearance of an oral glucose load from the circulation at rest and after endurance exercise in healthy men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据