4.2 Article

Effects of a Dairy Supplement and Resistance Training on Lean Mass and Insulin-Like Growth Factor in Women

出版社

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.21.3.181

关键词

yogurt; exercise; body composition; hormones

资金

  1. Department of Women and Gender Studies
  2. University of North Carolina Greensboro

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine the effect of yogurt supplementation pre- and postexercise on changes in body composition in overweight women engaged in a resistance-training program. Methods: Participants (age = 36.8 +/- 4.8 yr) with a body-mass index of 29.1 +/- 2.1 kg/m(2) were randomized to yogurt supplement (YOG; n = 15) or isoenergetic sucrose beverage (CONT; n = 14) consumed before and after exercise for 16 wk. Participants were also instructed to reduce energy intake daily (-1,046 kJ) during the study. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, waist circumference, and sagittal diameter. Strength was measured with 1-repetition maximum. Dietary recalls were obtained by a multipass approach using Nutrition Data System software. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin-like growth-factor-binding protein-3 were measured with ELISA. Results: Significant weight losses of 2.6 +/- 4.5 kg (YOG) and 1.2 +/- 2.5 kg (CONT) were observed. Total lean weight increased significantly over time in both YOG (0.8 +/- 1.2 kg) and CONT (1.1 +/- 0.9 kg). Significant reductions in total fat (YOG = 3.4 +/- 4.1 kg vs. CONT = 2.3 +/- 2.4 kg) were observed over time. Waist circumference, sagittal diameter, and trunk fat decreased significantly over time without group differences. Both groups significantly decreased energy intake while maintaining protein intake. Strength significantly increased over time in both groups. No changes over time or between groups were observed in hormone levels. Conclusions: These data suggest that yogurt supplementation offered no added benefit for increasing lean mass when combined with resistance training and modest energy restriction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据