4.6 Article

Functional disparity between human PAWP and PLCζ in the generation of Ca2+ oscillations for oocyte activation

期刊

MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 702-710

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gav034

关键词

PAWP; phospholipase C zeta; fertilization; oocyte activation; sperm factor

资金

  1. U-FP7 Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship Award [628634]
  2. National Institute for Social Care and Health Research (NISCHR)
  3. Cardiff University School of Medicine
  4. Libyan Ministry of Education
  5. Health and Care Research Wales [HF-14-16] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian oocyte activation is mediated by cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) oscillations initiated upon delivery of a putative 'sperm factor' by the fertilizing sperm. Previous studies suggest the identity of this sperm factor as the testis-specific phospholipase C-zeta (PLC zeta). Recently, a post-acrosomal sheath WW domain-binding protein (PAWP) has been proposed as an alternative sperm factor candidate, following a report that human PAWP protein and cRNA elicited Ca2+ oscillations in mouse and human oocytes. Those Ca2+ oscillations were inhibited by a PAWP-derived peptide corresponding to a functional PPGY binding motif. Herein, using a series of human PAWP expression constructs, we demonstrate that both human PAWP protein and cRNA are, in our experiments, unable to elicit Ca2+ release following microinjection into mouse oocytes. Parallel experiments performed with human PLC zeta elicited the characteristic Ca2+ oscillations present at mammalian fertilization, which produced oocyte activation and embryo development. Furthermore, sperm-induced Ca2+ oscillations were not inhibited in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Thus, the functional disparity with PLC zeta leads us to conclude that human PAWP is neither sufficient nor necessary for the Ca2+ oscillations that initiate mammalian oocyte activation at fertilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据