4.6 Article

Assessment of existing and introduction of a new and robust efficient definition of the representative volume element

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
卷 50, 期 24, 页码 3817-3828

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.016

关键词

Representative volume element; Homogenization; Finite element; Random orientation; Fiber composites

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  3. NSERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate numerical homogenization necessitates the thorough determination of the Representative Volume Element (RVE). There exists several seminal works on the notion of the RVE in homogenization, its definitions and methods of determination for efficient computation of composite effective properties. The objective of the current work is to assess the ability of numerical RVE determination methods to deliver accurate effective properties of composite materials. This paper demonstrates that common and well-established RVE determination methods, based on studying the convergence rate of the effective properties with respect to the volume element size, are invalid for the case of composites reinforced by randomly oriented fibers and yield erroneous estimates of their effective properties. Following the failure of traditional RVE determination methods, we proposed a new RVE determination criterion that is not based on the average property stability, but its statistical variations. Our new proposed criterion has been shown to be more accurate than other criteria in computing the effective properties of composites for aspect ratios up to 60. Moreover, the proposed criterion does not necessitate a convergence study over the volume element size, hence reducing considerably the RVE determination cost. Finally, our work questions the validity of many published works dealing with composites including heterogeneities of high aspect ratios. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据