4.7 Article

Seismic travel-time and attenuation tomography to characterize the excavation damaged zone and the surrounding rock mass of a newly excavated ramp and chamber

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.06.010

关键词

Mining; Time-lapse tomography; Excavation damaged zone; Underground lab; Attenuation

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [03G0738A, 03G0752A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seismic travel-time and attenuation tomography were applied to characterize the excavation damaged zone and the adjacent rock mass in the GFZ-Underground-Lab within the research and education mine Reiche Zeche of the Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg (Germany). The lab is situated in gneiss rocks at 150 m depth and comprises three galleries which enclose an area of approximately 50 m x 100 m. Along these galleries two seismic surveys were performed before and after the excavation of a new ramp and chamber. For both measurements, travel-time and attenuation tomographies for P-waves were performed with the ray-based inversion algorithm SIMULPS14. The seismic velocities were calculated from first-arrival travel Limes whereas a logarithmic-spectral-ratio approach was used to calculate the corresponding quality factors (Q) for attenuation tomography. A comparison of the tomograms reveals a decrease of average P-wave velocity values from 5.64 km/s to 5.54 km/s and of average Q-values from 29.8 to 26.5 in the whole area after the excavation of the new cavities. The maximum changes are located at already weakened zones either at the conjunction of two galleries or of a major fracture zone with a gallery. The attenuation tomography shows a higher sensitivity to rock mass changes than the travel-time tomography. However, the calculation of the Q-values demands a higher signal quality than the determination of the seismic travel times. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据