4.7 Article

Ground reaction curves for deep circular tunnels considering the effect of ground reinforcement

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.01.003

关键词

Analytical model; Ground reaction curve; Ground reinforcement; Tunnel

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB732100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51108020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the behavior of tunnels in the presence of ground reinforcement, an analytical model of the convergence-confinement type is proposed. A deep circular tunnel with a far-field hydrostatic stress is considered. An equivalent reinforced region is introduced to represent the effect of ground improvement. Both the reinforced ground and the natural ground are assumed to be linear-elastic prior to the yield. They obey the linear Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion. Their post-yield behavior follows the non-associated flow rule defined by the dilation angle. Due to the different degrees of strengthening and the radius of the reinforced zone, the plastic zone(s), if any, may theoretically initiate from the inner boundary of the reinforced zone, the outer boundary of the reinforced zone, or both the inner and the outer boundaries simultaneously. In order to solve the proposed problem, six different configurations that can possibly be encountered according to the distribution and extent of the plastic zone(s) are solved. Additionally, seven critical unconfinement factors, each of which defines a possible transition between two consecutive configurations encountered, are also solved. Furthermore, a flow chart is designed to determine the actual configuration transitions with the input of the calculated critical unconfinement factors. The proposed analytical model is validated by a series of numerical simulations. A comparison reveals that the proposed model excels the classical Salencon's model in solving the mentioned problem. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据