4.7 Article

Dynamic response of rock mass induced by the transient release of in-situ stress

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.05.001

关键词

Rock mass; Dynamic response; Blasting; In-situ stress; Transient release

资金

  1. Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973Program) [2010CB732003, 2011CB013501]
  2. Chinese National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51125037]
  3. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [50909077, 51179138]
  4. Academic Award Nominee for Excellent PhD Candidates
  5. Wuhan University [T2011206009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the excavation of rock mass with the method of drill and blast, the release of in-situ stress, also known as excavation load on boundary, is traditionally assumed as a quasi-static process, so the inertia and all other dynamic responses induced by the release of in-situ stress can be ignored. After analyzing the process of release of in-situ stress induced by rock mass excavation with the method of drill and blast and determining the duration of the release of in-situ stress, it is found that the release of in-situ stress induced strain rate can reach a magnitude of 10(-1)-10(1)/s or higher if the initial in-situ stress has a level of 20-50 MPa, it implies that the release of in-situ stress is a transient process, and the transient character of the release of in-situ stress and correspondingly induced dynamic response of surrounding rock should be taken into account together with excavation. Problems such as the determination of redistributed in-situ stress corresponding to initiation sequences of millisecond delays, the way and path of the transient release of in-situ stress, transient release of in-situ stress induced vibration and comparison with blasting induced vibration are also discussed in this paper. Finally, a case of in-situ stress release induced vibration in Pubugou hydropower projects are presented as verifications. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据