4.7 Article

Estimation of in situ stress along deep tunnels buried in complex geological conditions

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.03.016

关键词

In situ stress; Deep tunnel; Integrated analysis; Topography; Multi-source information

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [2010CB732006, 51079144, 50979104]
  2. Ertan Hydropower Development Company, Ltd.
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [KZCX2-EW-QN115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The headrace tunnels of the Jinping II Hydropower Station are 16.7 km in length and have a maximum depth of 2525 m. Many difficulties have been encountered in estimation of virgin rock stresses along the tunnels. One method was presented including the macroscopic analysis of the region geological structures and topography and the integrated analysis of in situ stresses based on the multi-source information in local tunnel sections. The characteristics of geological structures and tectonic movement were studied to determine the orientations of the tectonic stresses within the Jinping II tunnel project region. The influences of the topography on the distribution of in situ stress were analyzed using numerical methods. The virgin stress regimes were preliminarily estimated based on the geological and topographical analysis and the World Stress Map. Under the guidance of these results, multi-source information was collected regarding rock brittle failures, EDZs, core disking and large-scale deformation of soft rock. Several techniques were adopted, including multivariate regression, numerical simulation, and stereographic projection. An iterative method for the orientations and magnitudes of in situ stresses is presented. The in situ stress regimes, orientations, and magnitudes in tunnel sections of different depths were obtained and verified. They can provide the basic conditions for analysis of the stability of surrounding rock mass during excavation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据