4.7 Article

Probability-dependent gain-scheduled control for discrete stochastic delayed systems with randomly occurring nonlinearities

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.2788

关键词

gain-scheduled control; randomly occurring nonlinearities; time-varying Bernoulli distribution; probability-dependent Lyapunov function; sector-nonlinearity; parameter-varying systems; discrete-time stochastic systems

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust of the UK
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK [GR/S27658/01]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61028008, 61134009, 61074016, 61104125, 60974030]
  4. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation of China [10ZR1421200]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation of Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the gain-scheduled control problem is addressed by using probability-dependent Lyapunov functions for a class of discrete-time stochastic delayed systems with randomly occurring sector nonlinearities. The sector nonlinearities are assumed to occur according to a time-varying Bernoulli distribution with measurable probability in real time. The multiplicative noises are given by means of a scalar Gaussian white noise sequence with known variances. The aim of the addressed gain-scheduled control problem is to design a controller with scheduled gains such that, for the admissible randomly occurring nonlinearities, time delays and external noise disturbances, the closed-loop system is exponentially mean-square stable. Note that the designed gain-scheduled controller is based on the measured time-varying probability and is therefore less conservative than the conventional controller with constant gains. It is shown that the time-varying controller gains can be derived in terms of the measurable probability by solving a convex optimization problem via the semi-definite programme method. A simulation example is exploited to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedures. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据