4.7 Article

Ground fluidization promotes rapid running of a lightweight robot

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 859-869

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364913481690

关键词

bio-inspired robot; legged locomotion; granular media

类别

资金

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  2. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Micro Autonomous Systems and Technology (MAST) Collaborative Technology Alliance (CTA)
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) Physics of Living Systems (PoLS)
  4. Army Research Office (ARO)
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Physics [1150760] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the locomotor mechanics of a small, lightweight robot (DynaRoACH, 10 cm, 25 g) which can move on a granular substrate of 3 mm diameter glass particles at speeds up to 5 body length/s, approaching the performance of certain desert-dwelling animals. To reveal how the robot achieves this performance, we used high-speed imaging to capture its kinematics, and developed a numerical multi-body simulation of the robot coupled to an experimentally validated simulation of the granular medium. Average speeds measured in experiment and simulation agreed well, and increased nonlinearly with stride frequency, reflecting a change in propulsion mode. At low frequencies, the robot used a quasi-static rotary walking mode, in which the substrate yielded as legs penetrated and then solidified once vertical force balance was achieved. At high frequencies the robot propelled itself using the speed-dependent fluid-like inertial response of the material. The simulation allows variation of parameters which are inconvenient to modify in experiment, and thus gives insight into how substrate and robot properties change performance. Our study reveals how lightweight animals can achieve high performance on granular substrates; such insights can advance the design and control of robots in deformable terrains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据